After the EU summit, German Chancellor Angela Merkel met with the Bavarian CSU without resistance due to the outcome of the summit, and Interior Minister Horst Seehofer announced a “statement” on Sunday 1 July. Seehofer threatened to order “national measures” and reject migrants registered in other EU countries. It was reported that he considered discussions with Merkel on June 30, 2018 in Berlin on the summit results to be “ineffective” and “unnecessary” and said Merkel`s plan would create new “pull factors” for asylum seekers coming to Europe. [3] He also rejected a proposal by Merkel to place asylum seekers already registered in EU countries in “anchoring centres” that would allow for faster deportations. [23] The German Social Democrats (SPD), the Greens and the Free Democrats (FDP) signed a coalition agreement on Tuesday that sets out how to accelerate a green transition and modernise Europe`s largest economy when they take power this week. Defense and development: The coalition agreement is vague on this point and commits to spending an additional €2 billion ($2.46 billion) on “international responsibility” and medium-term plans to invest about an additional €9 billion, but the issue remains controversial between the parties. All investments in development will be linked to higher defence spending. The future new German government has agreed on a coalition agreement. The pro-business SPD, Greens and Free Democrats (FDP) said they would present the deal on Wednesday at a press conference at 15:00 CET in Berlin. Energy and climate experts wanted to know how the party`s trio — called the “traffic light coalition” after the party`s colors — wants to deliver on its central promise to put the country on a 1.5°C trajectory.
In a preliminary agreement ahead of formal coalition talks, the parties said they “ideally” wanted to advance coal phase-out by 2030, introduce a climate emergency program and “significantly accelerate” the expansion of renewable energy, among many other steps. However, the details of energy and climate policy have proven to be among the hardest nuts to break during formal talks. The Social Democratic Party of Germany is about to vote on whether to negotiate with Angela Merkel`s conservatives on another so-called grand coalition. If the party says “no”, the Chancellor`s options could run out. (21.01.2018) The agreement, reached more than five months after the September elections, was an important victory for Angela Merkel, who is expected to begin her fourth and final term as chancellor at the head of another “grand coalition”. The SPD base voted in favour of the agreement in early March, the last major obstacle to the formation of a government. The three parties that form the next government coalition in Germany (subject to formal party approval next week and the election of Chancellor Olaf Scholz on 6 December) stress in their coalition agreement that their central task is to put Germany on the path to 1.5°C. Third, as with the previous coalition, the current coalition is still interested in exploring areas of possible constructive cooperation with Russia. In this regard, Germany can draw on Norway`s experience to maintain cooperation in important but less controversial areas and, if necessary, to draw a clear line. In an atmosphere of growing uncertainty – both about Russia`s strategic and military goals and about the distribution of power between the president and Russia`s economic elites – the new government must be prepared to be tough if necessary, for example by developing stronger tools to assess whether Moscow is using gas supply as a weapon and acting accordingly in close coordination with allied allies. as a last resort, additional sanctions. At the same time, the government must be open to finding ways, albeit unlikely, to restore the spirit of cooperation expressed 20 years ago in President Putin`s speech to the Bundestag whenever possible.
In June 2018, the coalition government, in particular the sister CDU/CSU parties, argued over the specificities of asylum policy. After Interior Minister Horst Seehofer (CSU) announced a “master plan” on asylum policy with 63 points[15] – 62 of which would have been agreed between Seehofer and Chancellor Angela Merkel (CDU)[1] – there were differences on the issue of rejecting asylum seekers who were already registered in other EU countries. After Seehofer threatened “national measures,” i.e. the closure of borders for these asylum seekers, Merkel called for two weeks of talks on a “European solution” and called on the night of September 28-29. An EU summit on migration policy in the field of asylum policy was held in June. [16] [17] The outcome of the summit is seen as a “vague” success for Merkel. The Visegrád Group, represented by the Hungarian Prime Minister, said the EU was beginning to accept its proposals to deal with asylum seekers. [18] [19] On July 9, it was reported that the government coalition had achieved a certain degree of stability so that the government could negotiate bilateral agreements with other European countries. Meanwhile, talks have begun with Austria and Italy to close Mediterranean migration routes from Africa to Europe. [30] The Social Democrat winner of the elections Olaf Scholz wants to be appointed Federal Chancellor in the week of 6th December. Before that, the Greens will invite the party`s 120,000 members to vote online on the coalition agreement.
Spd and FDP organize the 4. and 5. December party congress to get their members` support for the deal. As reasonable as the coalition agreement may seem in the area of defence and security policy, the most pressing question is whether the new government will put it into practice effectively. There are also a few issues that have not been addressed (for understandable reasons, since the document only serves as a general guideline), but that might be worth considering for the “traffic light” parties: Later in the evening of July 2, an agreement was reached between the sister parties of the CDU/CSU. .